
In Mexico it was Bobby Charlton's baldhead and last time Theo Walcott set tongues wagging, but what will the big World Cup 2010 debate be?
For me, the most unnerving moment of any football match featuring the commentary of John Motson is when some minor incident causes the BBC veteran to gurgle, "And they'll be debating that one in pubs and clubs up and down the country for months to come…"
Admittedly Motty – with his weird notion that the population is perpetually on the verge of nipping out to put the kettle on – sometimes appears to have such a slim grasp on everyday reality he makes Marie Antoinette look like Gordon Brown – and vice versa – but even so I can't help worrying that he might actually be correct. This is disturbing because if a ball-to-hand-hand-to-ball incident in a game between Birmingham City and Blackburn genuinely does monopolise conversation across the nation for weeks on end, then, frankly, there is no wonder obesity levels are on the rise – a heart attack would seem the only guaranteed escape from the tedium of it all.
Motson is not alone in his strange obsession with football arguments, of course. Many commentators voice the opinion, as half-time approaches, that there "have been plenty of talking points for the boys back in the studio to get their teeth into". Indeed, so strongly is this emphasised by some that a visitor to our shores might conclude the British only invented football to give Alan Shearer the chance to drone "Very much so" in a tone that resembles a stunned bluebottle, Alan Hansen to tell that bloody story about Bob Paisley saying "You run the first five yards in your head", and Andy Townsend to get his magic pen out and scribble all over the screen like a kid with an Etch‑A-Sketch trying to draw a dinosaur playing the trombone.
It seems to me, though, that people very rarely actually debate offside decisions, or red cards. There's no point to it. Folk take their position on the matter and there's no shifting them. It's like Richard Dawkins debating the existence of God with the pope. It will just go on all night and resolve nothing and in the end the best thing would just be to put them in a cage and let them fight. At the end we'd still be none the wiser but at least we'd see some blood. For what it's worth I'd put money on Benedict by a stranglehold submission, but then I always bet on my fears.
The only time this really changes is round now, in World Cup year. The Fifa World Cup brings with it many opportunities to fill official roles. There is an official film, an official song, official merchandise, an official beer, an assortment of official snack foods, official money-lenders and, in all probability, an official solvent-free extra strong clear adhesive for wood, metal and ceramics. The most prestigious and coveted of all of these roles, however, is that of Official FA Talking Point. To look down the arguments that have occupied this traditional position is to read a veritable who's who of irresolvable football discourse that began back in 1950 with the first one of all: "Should we actually be playing Johnny Foreigner?"
In 1966 it was "Where are our wingers?" with a side wrangle of Greaves v Hurst. In 1970 the nation fretted over whether Bobby Charlton's bald head would be a liability in the midday Mexican sun and Sir Alf's reluctance to field Peter Osgood. In 1982 it was "Should we build a team around Glenn Hoddle?" Bryan Robson's shoulder ushered in a new era of insidious medical chat in 1986 that has since featured several long-running discussions surrounding the metatarsals of Manchester United players. In 1998 we were treated to twin-pronged delights as manager Glenn Hoddle brilliantly paired "Is Michael Owen old enough to start matches?" with "Has David Beckham got his right head on?" While last time around the phlegmatic Sven-Goran Eriksson dummied to go with "Who the heck is Theo Walcott?" while secretly teeing up "Can Frank Lampard and Steven Gerrard play together in central midfield?"
What will happen this time around is currently a cause of grave uncertainty with David Beckham's ruptured achilles tendon putting a sudden stop to a discussion many believed had the potential to go all the way to the inevitable quarter-final penalty shoot-out. The brutal conclusion to "Is Becks worth a place on the bench?" following on from the equally quick curtailment of the "Will the presence of John Terry and Wayne Bridge divide the dressing room?" and the abrupt finish of the weak, but seemingly always with us "Can a fit and in-form Michael Owen be left behind?" has left a yawning gap.
For those tasked with unearthing the Official FA Talking Point of 2010 this has been a month of anxiety. With "Adam Johnson's surely worth a look" and "I can't help wondering about Ashley Cole's mental state" so far failing to catch on the field is wide open. Clive Tyldesley, an appallingly influential figure when it comes to making tedious things seem far more important than they actually are, has taken up the cudgels for "You've got to have Crouchy in the starting line-up". However, unlike the Spurs striker I'm not sure this one has much in the way of legs.


" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2010/mar/19/david-beckham-achilles-world-cup">Beckham has left us without a talking point 
The Football Association and anti-doping authorities look further apart than ever ove testing procedures before the World Cup
Fabio Capello's players look ever more likely to escape being monitored by anti-doping enforcers before the World Cup. Discussions between the Football Association and the national anti-doping authorities over an elite-player testing pool have been under way for more than a year and there was initial success: both sides reported last July that they had reached agreement on a broad outline of what such a body would look like.
But now the two sides look further apart than ever over how many and which England players will be tested: the only thing they shared yesterday was an unwillingness to discuss the proposals.
There is a deadlock in negotiations given the new UK Anti-Doping agency, which was set up in December, now answers directly to the World Anti-Doping Agency, while the FA is mindful how England players reacted with threatened industrial action over Rio Ferdinand's eight-month ban for a missed test.
There is no such difficulty at the Rugby Football League, which has had a similar system in place since last May. It has 17 international squad players in the National Registered Testing Pool, who must give notice of their whereabouts for an hour a day, seven days a week. It was from that pool that Terry Newton became the first athlete to test positive for human growth hormone use.
Eccles faces FA fight
The Football Association yesterday appointed Julian Eccles as its director of communications. Eccles, who performed the same role at Sky and Ofcom, will be tasked with avoiding the sort of public relations disaster that was the FA's response to the government's seven questions on football governance. But at the moment it looks as if Eccles will be fighting with one hand tied behind his back.
Although the FA's own strategy document Vision 2008-12 recognised a need to monitor structural changes arising out of the Burns review (which proposed changes to the way the FA governs itself), very little has been done. The document called for "a proper review during the term of the strategy of all the aspects of the changes whether at council, board or Football Regulatory Authority level".
Now, halfway through the four-year term, the chief executive, Ian Watmore, has reported back to the council on the early findings of his FRA review. He told a council meeting on Wednesday he wants to cut back on transfer market red tape and will come up with proposals in May. That is the easy bit. Meanwhile no one grasps the nettle still over how to tackle the 19th-century council and board structures that Lord Burns tried in vain to reform.
Ivory Coast guards
The Ivory Coast professional club ASEC Mimosas, whose academy produced the Premier League stars Emmanuel Eboué, Salomon Kalou and Kolo Touré, have sought assistance from a European research institute to prevent their players leaving Abidjan too early. The Professional Football Players' Observatory has linked up with the Ivorian club to provide advice. A statement said: "The idea is to create conditions for players to leave not only to clubs who are best placed to develop them but also at the right time, once they have acquired top-level experience in the ASEC first team." Which is all a far cry from when they were selling first‑dibs rights to a network of European clubs that included Charlton Athletic.
Couch potato land
A House of Commons research paper last month examined what effect hosting the 2012 Olympics will have on sports participation and remarked: "Most studies have concluded that no host country has yet experienced a lasting increase in sports participation." Now even some of Sport England's own figures are starting to demonstrate it. On Wednesday Sport England released the results of its Active People Survey, which reflects the value it gives for its £258m annual budget. The figures, from January 2009 to January 2010, show that 24.07m people were not taking part in any moderate-intensity sport at all.
The figures for the 12 months from October 2005, starting three months after the Olympics were awarded to London, showed only 23.927m were that inactive – the increase equivalent to everyone in Telford taking to the settee. Sport England says that is because the population has grown. At least in two years the couch potatoes will have some nice stadiums to watch on telly.


" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/mar/19/england-world-cup-uk-anti-doping">Digger: England anti-doping talks hit deadlock 
• Avram Grant says points deduction punishes wrong people
• Pompey 'do not have duty to other teams' in the league
Avram Grant reflected on a "sad day for football" after the confirmation of Portsmouth's nine-point deduction for going into administration and he hinted that the bottom club might be tempted to field a weakened team in their remaining Premier League matches.
The deduction virtually guarantees Portsmouth will play in the Championship next season as they now have only 10 points, 17 from safety with nine games left and 14 behind second-from-bottom Hull City, whom they face at Fratton Park tomorrow.
By then Grant will have gauged the mood in the squad, who still have an FA Cup semi-final against Chelsea at Wembley to aim for but may lack motivation for what are, to all intents, meaningless league matches.
"Even though the writing was on the wall a long time ago and I tried to tell everybody we would do our best, for me this is a sad day," Grant said. "A football decision has not been decided on the pitch. It has been decided in an office somewhere and that is wrong.
"What they have done with this decision is not punish the people who did something wrong, so now the people who come along next time will think, 'OK, I can go away to my house and they will punish the fans and everybody who came after.' This is not good."
Grant intends to give the Portsmouth players the chance to air their views after today's training session. "I will talk with the players about it tomorrow and we will make a decision and go from there," said the Portsmouth manager last night.
"It is not easy because we still believed that even with all the difficulties we could fight against relegation, because Portsmouth did that a few years ago. Now we need to think about everything."
Grant added: "Football needs to be decided on the pitch. You need to give all teams an equal chance, which we did not have in this case. "The decision was taken a long time ago that Portsmouth would not stay in the Premier League, for one reason or another.We do not have a duty to the other teams – the Premier League has a duty to the other teams. We tried everything in the last month to keep what I think the spirit of football is about.
"If we had given up before, people would not have thought that was good for the Premier League. We need to hear what the players think about what we need to do from now on."
The former Chelsea manager said: "For me it is a new situation. It is the first time in the history of the Premier League this has happened. Nobody knows how to deal with it. I said we would fight against relegation as long as we thought we had a chance – and we did. Now I do not know.
"When it has not happened, you always have hope. Now it is a different situation and we have to deal with it differently.""Now, we create the experience for the next one – because we will not be the last."
Andronikou claims former chief executive Peter Storrie, who is still acting as an advisor for the club, must bear part of the blame for the crisis that has engulfed the club.
Grant, though, maintained: "I must say, that in the time that I worked with Peter, he was 100% professional and tried to do everything to save the club.
"What happened in the past, I do not know."


" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/mar/19/portsmouth-avram-grant">Doomed Portsmouth may field weakened team in Premier League 
• Left-back 'very wound-up' when he announced England boycott
• James Milner is very important for England, says coach
Fabio Capello remains hopeful that Wayne Bridge will reverse his decision to pull out of the England squad. The Manchester City left-back Bridge announced that he did not want to be considered for selection following revelations of an affair between John Terry and Vanessa Perroncel, Bridge's former girlfriend and the mother of his child. But Capello has revealed his belief that the announcement was motivated by anger and his hope that time could yet prove a healer in the build-up to this summer's World Cup.
Bridge pulled out of the England squad on 25 January, claiming that his inclusion would be "untenable and potentially divisive". Capello immediately released a statement through the Football Association saying that the door would always be open. Now, he has expressed his hope that having overcome the initial shock, Bridge will reconsider his position before June.
"Wayne Bridge was very wound up, very angry, when he made the decision," Capello told the Spanish channel Gol Televisión. "There is still time for him to change his mind." Bridge is currently out of action for a month following a hernia operation.
Asked if it was hard to take the armband off Terry, Capello replied: "No. Players and fans want the captain's armband to be worn by an exemplary player. They want the captain to be an example for young children. What happened with Terry wasn't good. I saw him at Wembley and we spoke about [the affair] and we spoke about football. It was fine. He understood [my decision]. I explained to him that he could not continue as captain but I also told him that he would continue to be a leader on the pitch and an important player because a coach needs a player like that."
The England coach confirmed that he has asked David Beckham to join the squad in South Africa, even though the Milan midfielder will miss out on the tournament because of a torn achilles tendon. Capello said of Beckham: "He is an important player for us; he never caused any problems whatsoever. Whether he played 10, 15 or 20 minutes, he always had the same attitude and he was always ready. He was an important man in the dressing room. In fact, we have asked David to be with us in South Africa; if he wants to, he can come with us. It depends on him and it depends on how he feels with his achilles. But we know he can't play now for six months. I hope he comes back fit afterwards."
In Beckham's absence Capello's options on the right side of midfield have shortened but he has been impressed with the response of two players. "Last year Theo Walcott who was the player that most surprised me – he was very important during qualifying," the England coach said. "This year [James] Milner from Aston Villa has played a number of games with us and he is very important.
"But the most important player is Wayne Rooney. He scores lots of goals; he finishes everything. Players need time. Rooney started at Everton at 16 and he has matured. Right now, his form is incredible and I hope he can maintain that level until South Africa. There are three players who are on a different level at the moment. One is [Lionel] Messi, one is Cristiano Ronaldo and one is Rooney. They are a step above everyone else in the world."


" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/mar/19/wayne-bridge-fabio-capello-england">Fabio Capello says Wayne Bridge can still change mind over World Cup 
Hull would prefer a £16m Premier League problem to the £21m headache awaiting in the Championship
Iain Dowie is due for a surprise first appearance in the Fratton Park technical area tomorrow, as Hull City travel to Portsmouth for a crunch meeting with the club whose multiple woes shape the Premier League's most cautionary tale. Bust, in turmoil and relegated is a place Hull's chairman, Adam Pearson, is determined his club must never be but Pompey, after their nine-point deduction for going into administration, look irretrievably down.
The idea of Portsmouth's administrator, Andrew Andronikou, mounting a challenge to the nine-point penalty appears wilfully blind to the reasons it has been imposed. Portsmouth, like all clubs who declare insolvency and enter administration, will emerge, under whichever new owner, having almost certainly not paid their debts in full. HM Revenue and Customs, and all the high-and-dry creditors in the usual dispiriting list, will be asked to take a cut of what they are owed, while "football creditors" – the amply rewarded players – will, according to the league's rules, be paid in full.
Clubs themselves, first in the Football League then in the Premier League, voted overwhelmingly for points penalties to be imposed on clubs who do this. The principle is that, if clubs do not meet their responsibilities, they cannot compete without sanction against others dutifully paying their way.
Pearson, the commercial director who managed to emerge with an unblemished record even as Leeds United "lived the dream" around him in 2002-03, is shaped by that experience into trying to manage football dreams with care. He bought Hull out of their own wretched administration in 2001, oversaw the club's rebuilding and move to the KC Stadium, then in 2007 sold out to the current owner, the Essex property investor Russell Bartlett. Pearson bought into Derby County, then returned to Hull last October at Bartlett's invitation, after the former chairman, Paul Duffen, resigned. Duffen claimed he was owed money on his contract and Hull then sued Duffen, claiming he had been suspended before his resignation and accusing him of accepting payments from agents, unnamed, for directing club business their way. Duffen denied it all, then the case was settled last month on terms neither side has revealed.
What did become certain, and was reinforced this week, is that Hull have financial challenges, having made a £13m loss under Bartlett and Duffen to gain promotion from the Championship. The club's accounts for the 14 months to 31 July 2008, filed several months late, carried the warning that Hull had to repay all their £22m bank loans by July this year and so would need £23m extra if they found themselves relegated, £16m even if they stayed in the Premier League. The accountants, Deloitte, decided that position was shaky enough to "represent a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt over the company's ability to continue as a going concern".
Pearson, on taking over, argued that the £36m wage bill had to be wrestled down, and £5.3m had been committed in agents' fees. Duffen had argued the wage bill was not excessive and predicted the club would show a profit for 2008-09.
Hull's accounts for the year to 31 July 2009 were published this week and did indeed show a profit, of £1m. The wage bill, £34m then, looks manageable as the club recorded a turnover in its first Premier League season of £51m. Yet Deloitte issued almost exactly the same warning again. Hull, the accountants said, will need to find an additional £21m from selling players or raising finance if relegated, and £16m even if Dowie can harangue his inherited team into staying up. Again the accountants judged this represented "a material uncertainty" about the club's ability to stay in business.
The key to the club's dilemma is in its bank debt. The amount owed is down now to £4.6m, which Pearson justifiably described as the lowest in the league – yet it has to be repaid in full by July. The money is owed to Investec, which has been advancing Hull loans in the Premier League against TV and other money the club were due to receive from the League. That £4.6m is but a fingernail of the monster which has devoured Portsmouth, yet Hull were also stated to owe £15m to "trade creditors" and £4.5m in tax.
The accounts stated that they are trying to borrow again: "The club is currently in advanced discussions with finance providers for the acceleration of known Premier League distributions [money due from the Premier League] for amounts of £7m."
Pearson, who ran Hull prudently for six years before coming back to deal with all this, said this week he is confident the club will manage. He will, though, be hoping fervently that Dowie can steer Hull into the £16m Premier League problem, rather than the £21m headache lurking in the Championship.


" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2010/mar/19/hull-city-portsmouth-finances">Iain Dowie and Hull City wary of Portsmouth's cautionary tale | David Conn